The US antimonopoly costume moves forward
everything from Apple Watch to an apple wallet will be considered due to the non-specific nature of the antimonopoly costume. It is expected that the Ministry of Justice will try to repel DMA in the EU in its approach to attacking the Apple business and as a result of its regulation. despite the fact that, despite the fact that What the lawsuit implies, Apple actively competes with several brands on several fronts. The idea that he has a bestsellers smart clock or a popular messaging service due to blocking was thrown in order earlier.
The Apple Commission has been repeatedly considered fair and legal for the courts, although its practice of anti -world is not. As soon as the Ministry of Justice can present a more detailed set of arguments with examples, it will be easier to understand the purpose of the trial. The original application suggested that Apple prevented the formation of “Super Appendices”, did not allow streaming services of the game, did not allow cross-platform applications of messaging, purposefully reduced competing smart watches and limited digital purse. The Super Appendix argument was heard several times earlier. In fact, this boils down to the fact that Apple does not allow applications to become its own operating system with domestic applications stores, banking, chat functions and more baked in one application. A separate antimonopoly claim was filed by a company called Proton over Super Apps. This suggests that Apple, which allows WeChat to exist in China, should mean that they can exist in another place. the complaint about the streaming services of the game has already been considered, although no one still bit. If Microsoft wants to, it can send the XBOX streaming service to iOS as an application, but this is not so. Apple's application “Messages” now supports RCS, a cross-platform of messaging, which is better than SMS. Users also have the opportunity to choose various default applications, such as Messenger as of iOS 18.2. >There were complaints from third -party manufacturers of Smartwatch on integration. PEBBLE returned and compatible with the iPhone, but the manufacturer complained about how he could not compete with the options offered by Apple Watch. The Ministry of Justice may force Apple to offer more options and APIs. There is no clear way to do this without Apple to invent new systems from scratch, since he will not offer his applications in third -party stores. the Apple NFC reader has new functionality, which allows third -party applications to use the advantages. For example, Square can now accept Tap-to Pay from cards and phones with direct interaction with the iPhone. However, this probably will not be enough for the judicial claim of the Ministry of Justice. Most likely, he will strive for Apple to allow users to choose payment applications by default instead of blocking them in Apple Pay, as in the EU. even if most of the court’s arguments were either fully examined or released almost according to almost according Apple updates, updated, judicial legislation. It will take years to undergo a trial, and even when a verdict is issued, there will be appeals. The US government can fundamentally change another aspect of the Apple Apple approach to its platforms, although the developers and government seem to not tolerate impatiently. Instead of providing API for a new system that can represent complications or potential consequences for security or confidentiality, it spends time developing technology inside. As soon as he is ready, he issues more APIs and guidelines on how to implement once proprietary technology. There are some systems that Apple retains for themselves, for example, AirPlay, but usually, when users have alternatives, such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. What the Ministry of Justice asks, and why Apple repels so that Apple open technologies for third parties before they are ready. This can lead to the fact that Apple has been held for new technologies for many years before revealing them in order to prevent them from opening them before they are ready. has not yet been announced, but the initial arguments and the date of the trial date must be set in the near future. And regardless of the responsible administration, Apple will not receive any relief, since both democratic and republican leaders expressed interest in conducting antimonopoly affairs against Apple.
0 facesbook X.com reddit Bluesky antimonopoly complaints of the Ministry of Justice
Super Apps
the flow of the game
Messages of the Cross-Platform messages
compatibility with intelligent hours
Apple Wallet and NFC
the approaching battle of Apple
