Jecle8.jpg0bb037037092E81D3E8.> class =” Hidden-Xs “> 7 facebook X.com reddit Bluesky , in particular, Apple said that she proposed changes that, in her opinion, would make the company appropriate. The EU allegedly said Apple to wait, and then fined the company for not doing this.
naturally, the EU denies this. The representative of the European Commission Lee Zuber said that his fine “considers only a decision that Apple decided to expand, and not some other hypothetical approach that the company could consider.” , while Apple does not give details anymore, it included the iPhone Mirro-Mercry in its white paper 2024, since it was what it was because it was what it was because it was that it was that it was that it was that it was what it was in what it was that it was what it was what it was what it was what it was what it was what it was that it was what it was that it was what it was The fact that this was that it was that it was that it was that it was that it was that it was what it was in the form of Apple. Based on the current DMA rules and their application, Apple believes that it can be forced to resolve Android mirroring. also applies to the need to provide access to such technology of any third-party company that requests it. Apple notes that the iPhone mirroring is one of the very many technologies requested by the owner of Facebook Meta, although it seems to be “completely unrelated to the actual use of meta -in -abandoned devices.” the EU constantly demanded that Apple open iOS for competing developers. As part of this, the then head of the EU Margret Westager insisted that there was a “constructive dialogue”. She also claimed that the DMA rules “will ensure clarity for developers, third parties and Apple.” This has not happened yet. This is a small but useful new function in MacOS Tahoe, but EU users will not receive the living actions of the iPhone on Mac , but the unnamed Apple officials said Numerma that they were hoped To convey all the functions in the EU as soon as legitimate problems were understood. Apple is considered that EU He calls the gatekeeper platform due to the size of his iPhone user base. This is not considered this for Mac. Nevertheless, Apple also does not specifically bring the function of living actions by MacOS Tahoe for EU users and MDash; Perhaps if this brings Mac in accordance with the same rules. Despite the fact that MacOS 26 in Europe did not have any special announcement that there was no MacOS 26 in Europe, Apple was omitted, for example, in its press strokes. it is very unclear what Apple can or cannot do, or perhaps it will or will not do. While it blocks the iPhone mirroring and demonstrating the living actions of the iPhone on the Mac, it brings the function of the MacOS Tahoe phone calls to the Mac. This is a new function that allows users to make and accept phone calls to their Mac. But this works using the nearby iPhone user. Thus, there is no completely clear set Criteria for functions that are excluded from the EU. Neither Apple nor the EU commented on any details. BUT Including the Main Onees of iPhone Mirroring, At Present the List of Definite Exclusions is: SharePlay itself is working in the eu, But Shareplay Screen Sharing allows users to send everything that is on the screen iPhone for another device, such as Mac. In this sense, this does not differ from the mirror of the iPhone. it is also possible that the Apple Watch notifications will be affected or to some extent deleted in the future. This is again because the EU requires that third -party companies are provided with complete and equal access to iPhone technologies. is curious that the EU users will have the opportunity to place calls from their Mac using their nearby iPhone Apple repeatedly talks about the fact that Google is not required in order to make any technology from this release using Android, and Microsoft is not its technology. The EU position lies in the fact that providing all developers with equal access to Apple technology means that there will be more choice for users. , which seems commendable in theory, but in practice it will be only large firms and MDash; And probably large American firms & mdash; It will use this. Based on Apple's own reports on how Meta already requests unnecessary user data, I am sure that the EU laws will lead to confidentiality and security issues. there is also the fact that the fulfillment of these requirements on Apple means that the company should spend engineering time and money on execution when third-party developers have relatively few to do this. Apple says that, for example, she has already created a quarter of a million API to access its technology. , which may seem to be a problem of Apple, but the EU laws may require it to release its technology compatible with Android and other devices, at the same time it releases them for iPhone users. This undoubtedly lengthens the development time and means that all users around the world may encounter much longer delays before key new functions are available. “Today's solutions bring us down to the red ribbon, slowing Apple's ability to introduce innovations for users in Europe and forcing us to provide our new functions for free companies that do not need to play according to the same rules,” the AppleinSider statement in March 2025. “This is bad for our products and for our European users.” The basis of EUS DMA is a declared desire to be for the benefit of consumers. Nevertheless, its implementation necessarily leads to problems that relate to the competitors of Apple and MDash; And probably in a lack of customers. that Apple is insured by DMA
How DMA affects Mac
What functions will not come yet
Popular Posts

Death Stranding Director's Cut Coming to iPhone 15 Pro and Mac [U: Available Now]

Long-running App Store monopoly lawsuit granted class action status

Apple Vision Pro Apps You Should Try

Twitterrific creators want to defragment online media with Project Tapestry

Phil Schiller warns that third-party app stores are dangerous for iPhone users
