Apple#039; S iPhone 16e smartphone
0 Facebook X.com reddit
Testing took place in a separate 5G network in T-Mobile in New York under various signal conditions. The differences in performance were minimal near cell towers, but expanded significantly in the room and in the zones.
Android phones supported a four-piece aggregation along the descending communication line and a two-year surface, combining several frequency bands for higher bandwidth. The iPhone, on the other hand, was limited by nidique connections with three bearing and did not have aggregation of the rising communication line.
iPhone 16E often became hot to the touch during testing. While the study could not confirm that the heat directly affected by the results is known that thermal restrictions affect the performance of the modem in expanded real use.
Price and positioning of pushing direct comparisons
, B. while the testing method may seem sound-changing, justified sponspors-comps. Two Android phones were premium models at a price of 799 and $ 619.
The phones were equipped with the last modems of Qualcomm, which distort the results in favor of the sponsor. The iPhone 16e, on the contrary, is an Apple 599 model of US dollars and the first device with a fully user modem, which is not yet intended for premium devices.
, which makes direct price comparisons less significant.
the Apple iPhone 16 Pro model, which are still relying on Qualcomm modems and offer an extended antenna tuning, improved thermal structure and support for MMWAVE 5G, were not included in the study.
Android phones reached higher peak speeds 5G than the iPhone 16E both at the level of the modem and at the level of the user. Image loan: Cellular insights
, leaving these models,
iPhone 16E is also not enough MMWAVE 5G, which means that it cannot connect to the fastest 5G networks, usually available in stadiums or dense urban areas. For most users, this restriction will not matter, since the MMWAVE coating remains rare, so it is unclear how this influenced the study.
The results of the real world vary depending on the network and use. Independent testing found that the iPhone 16e could correspond or even exceed the models contributing to Qualcomm on At & amp; T and Verizon, when the signal strength is good.
in the areas of weak coatings, however, the Apple modem is lagging behind. One review found that the iPhone 16e controlled only 10 Mbps in the supermarket, while the Qualcomm phone reached more than 200 Mbps in the same place. These results show that Apple's early modem is still catching up with more mature designs.
Other factors, such as the design of the Apple antenna, the power management system and thermal restrictions also play a role in the formation of real performance. The integration of the modem C1 can improve over time, but now it is lags behind the demanding network environments.
For most users, modem performance is only one part of the common experience. The study shows that the Apple Modem strategy is still the basis for coating, especially when it comes to constant speed under stress.
