Cryptocurrency representations
An App Store User Is Suing Apple Because She Was Duped by A Fake Cryptocurrency App, Neglement to send money to rather obvious criminals. without a doubt, the Apple Apple Appendix Review Association used to failure. It seems that this new lawsuit is evidence of another, even if it should boast of the fact that it has protected users from $ 9 billion as a result of fraud over the past five years. Both statements can be true at the same time. This did not dissuade the applicant in a suit from the accusation of Apple, because she decided to send money to crypto -canom. Danyell Shin filed a class lawsuit against Apple to the Northern District Court of California, saying that the company is “authorized and maintaining malicious applications in its application store that allowed the theft of personal financial assets.” Shin claims that since Apple claims that the App Store apps is safe and safe, it bought an iPhone and uploaded the Crypto Vurrant application, which operates under the name SwiftCrypt. “Subsequently, after following instructions Contained in the Apps to Deposit Funds, and After What BE LEGITIMATE TRADES and GROUTH of their Funds,” ” Says The Full Court Filing, “Their Accounts Were Frozen and All the Money the Invested Was Stolen in a Cryptocurrency Investment Scown As ' Pig Butchering. ' ”
According to the statement, Shin says that she studied investments in the action, and at some point in 2024 joined the online disposable group. It seems that the leader of this group called on the participants to load SWIFTCRYPT and start trading, although, according to the visible, he did not provide a link to the legal version. Shin ultimately lost the application of about $ 80,000. Now she accuses Apple instead of scammers, both from fraud and from the fact that she in some way she “also overpayed for her iPhone.” This part of the statement is ridiculous with the explanation that the tire would pay less for the iPhone if Apple said that this application was fraud. It is unclear from the statement whether the application was a fake duplicate of the legitimate cryptocurrency application, or the statement is that SwiftCrypt will be filed. While SwiftCrypt received positive reviews from sites that, according to, offer financial advice, it is no longer in the App Store, and its official site has closed. Tire costume is a cool action based on the assumption that others believe the Apple's advertising about the security of the application store. In the lawsuit, no other members of its online investment groups appear, and it is unclear whether one of these participants in Google according to Android is presented. This lawsuit is the only case that filed tires, which means that it does not seem to have a claim to the leader of the group who recommended loading, as well as any corporate officers of SWIFTCRYPT. As a rule, the situation with such cases, she apparently suits Apple because they have money. It may be deceived by fraud, and this meets the interests of scammers. But, according to her LinkedIn profile, Shin is a marketing specialist and communications, and claims to study investments, including cryptocurrency. Apple really claims that its applications deserves confidence given that the applications were recommended by the online consultant, which she did not know, at least the tire should google SWIFTCRYPT, And at least it is clear that she did not conduct any research. Search now, limited by the dates that she would buy the application, returns one positive review, but also a few questions, whether it is a scam. According to this search, the application remains in the Google Play Store and has no reviews at all & mdash; Despite the fact that they claim to be loaded more than 10,000 times. The application has a support site, but not on what used to be its official address and MDash; And this is suspicious one page of Barebones. and it was fruitless, then too. In other words, there was a lot of evidence to make sure the application. It seems that she was suspicious of this, although it is unclear how often this leader of the group continued to vouch for it. Perhaps she asked questions, but, as you expect, given the nature of the Internet, we could not find any public reports that she was doing this. , nevertheless, she loaded the application without doing anything like enough or reasonable checks. And then she sent the money of scammers, willingly. When you go to the store, you do not buy a moldy salad, simply because it is in Whole Foods and should be good. You choose and choose what you prefer after you studied the salad from what the store has oversaw for you. You do not buy the M4 Max studio for $ 100 from the ebay seller with zero feedback and the account made yesterday. and you do not buy cryptography in a place with one recommendation and dozens of negative. there was also a lot of evidence that Apple also had to doubt this. Apple no longer has the only application for the iPhone in the EU, and it seems that it will be forced to allow third-party stores around the world. , of course, in the interests of Apple adhere to its own application store, but the company also has long claims that the alternative is the problem of confidentiality and security for users. For example, in 2021, Craig Federigi described the ability to download other iPhone applications as a “gold fever for cybercriminals”. The only thing that is more accurate than applications will be more fraud due to even fewer supervision. And the only thing that is more accurately than it is that Apple will be filed a lawsuit for this, even if the application is posted in a third -party application store. Apple will be sued because people will not distinguish between various suppliers. And since few other suppliers, and, of course, not the leaders of financial groups on the Internet, there will be as much money as Apple.
Caution of EMPTOR
