Apple vs Epic continues. Image Source: Epic Games
class = “Hidden-Xs”> facebook class = “hidden-xs”> x.com reddit Bluesky
“Beat between Apple and EPIC” continues when Judge Gonsals is violating Apple, in Apple, what can be in the apple, in Apple, which can be violated by Apple, in Apple, which can be violated by Apple. Prosecutors.
Epic vs Apple The test began as a result of the fact that epic games deliberately violate the rules of the application store to create a marketing campaign against Apple. The results had Apple to win on each aspect, except for one and MDash; Anti-Stores.
Apple was ordered through a court prohibition for 2021 to eliminate anti-light barriers to third-party enterprises, but the Apple App Store did not satisfy Epic Games. In March, a complaint was filed, which led to a very critical decision on April 30 from judge Ivonn Gonzalez Rogers.
According to the Bloomberg report, Apple was found in a deliberate violation of the judicial prohibition and must stop levying the commission for all purchases made outside the App Store. The company can also charge the criminal language, as the judge referred the case to the federal prosecutors.
Judge Ivonn Gonzalez Rogers explained in detail the violation of Apple.
“This did this with the obvious intention to create new anti-competitive barriers, which, by design and in fact, would maintain a valuable flow of income; income, previously recognized by anti-conciliation,” the judge writes in its violation. “The fact that he thought that this court would suffer such disobedience to be a rude miscalculation.”
Apple's reaction to a court prohibition was double & mdash; Offer a difficult decision on the external binder and to be charged with 27% of the commission. These requirements made a lawsuit almost useless, since no major enterprise used a stupid system.
Epic Games, Tim Suini, makes circles of victory on social networks, saying that Fortnite will return to the iOS app by the next week if Apple responds to a peaceful proposal. All that, in the mind, must be done by Apple is to eliminate commission on external purchases around the world, and not just in the United States.
If Apple does this, iOS receives Fortnite, and Epic will refuse litigation on this topic. Suini, obviously, sees in this a win -win option.
it is unclear how Apple will answer. Problems with Apple's conformity with a trial arose primarily out of fear of lost income.
Apple General Director Tim Cook and the former financial director of Luca Maestri agreed that they should carry out external purchases. This decision was made, despite the fact that the concern of the head of the application store Phil Schiller is a violation of the court prohibition.
If Tim Suin is followed by a global proposal, this will mean the end of the years of trial. Nevertheless, for Apple, it seems, there is no real benefit, and the company is not afraid to return to court.
Apple did not receive a public answer at the time of publication.
