3 facesbook Bluesky
is also unclear whether they are called the difference between what they receive, say, Microsoft in Xbox Store, Microsoft Tax. Or for people selling software or gift cards in Walmart.
it is obvious that the manufacturers of the Kame, which allows users to buy personalized messages from celebrities working until 2 o'clock in the morning. One night to prepare alternative payment options. Let's ask them that they will fall into their results, if there were no celebrities using the iPhone, and not fans of Starstruck.
In fact, according to this logic, the madness that fans will pay Kame when they could just go straight to these celebrities. With the exception, of course, in addition to photographs stuck fans and paparazzi, fans cannot do it easily or private without iPhone and App Store, which makes Apple.
and the general director of Otter complains about the need to pay more and more Apple, but this means that his business is growing due to the App Store.
This is not a matter of perspective. There is no other company in the world that is required to distribute the business that he grew up on the market that he literally created.
In the world there is no other business that is expected to conduct a global business that provides a store with more than two billion active users and will do it for free.
, of course, Stripe does not process payments for free. It is reported that the company addresses the application developers from the moment the App Store exchange, and offering the setting of these payment options.
It will only charge a 30 percent fee and a decrease by 2.9% of each transaction. This is undoubtedly lower than 15% or 30% Apple, but this is not free.
there is also a question that only Stripe or other payments processing companies are considered part of their transaction. For example, Apple manages support, and payments processing companies are not going to do any marketing for developers.
Apple created today's application market
If you were a developer before the Apple launched the App Store, his fee for 30% of the highest level is ridiculous. Without the costs of the production of physical carriers, without boxes, without payment stores for the stock of your application, no transport costs, you do not retain 70% of your retail contribution.
And you can sell around the world, which was inconceivable just a few years ago. Today it is easy, except when it is not & mdash; Apple processes all international tax requirements, so you do not need.
it is not crazy that there is a cost for doing business. Instead, this offends that the CEOs think that we will swallow this, and instead of paying Apple our money, instead run to pay them.
even information recognizes that there are developers who are solved relative to third-party applications stores, and partly due to the user resistance. It is reported that an indefinite percentage of users who click on an external link to payment will not execute a transaction from the additional steps that are required.
Apple claims that it is also that users can trust this, where they may not know exactly who they pay if they use alternative systems. They certainly have less security from any personal credit parts that are sold.
there is also a fear that Apple will punish such applications, burial them in an application store or simply never showing them in various basic functions or advertising promotions. If this does not tell the developers that Apple is how they receive customers, nothing will happen.
which will happen in the following
Separate studies say that users will need a large discount if they convince them to convince that they will convince him Display subscriptions from the Apple Store payment system. Some developers do this when Yoga Down Dog application uses discounts to stimulate users to move.
Down Dog already had an existing option for online payments, but says that it received 70% of new subscribers paying through Apple. Now it has already decreased to 30%.
Therefore, it works for some developers, and, therefore, all the developers want the same income growth and MDash; And keep all the advantages while in the App Store.
this is not entirely fair, since there are developers who instead claim that Apple should simply reduce their fees. Maybe there is an argument that needs to be brought there, or maybe it is just hope, at least for a cheaper trip instead of free.
developers need Apple and Apple developers. Appendix companies cannot expect Apple to support their business only in the hope that they can sell a few more iPhone to pay for it.
note that Apple tried to stop this through the call to suspend the court ban, which forced the external binding on it, but this failed.
Follow Appleinsider in Google News
