Apple asks to stay for violation of the judicial prohibitions class = “Hidden-Xs”> 0 Facebook X.com reddit Bluesky
EVEN THEN Apple HAS ALREADY ALLEDY ANLLOWED ALLECTURE OF FORECTIONS BUSINESS OPENS OF FORECTIONS, The company asked the US District California Court to be executed during the appeal.
Apple was in hot water after the judge decided that the company deliberately violates the court ban on the rules of anti-world. Apple followed the demands of the judge and appealed, but now she asks for another thing.
According to the report from the 9TO5MAC, in which the application was discovered, Apple asks the US district that it adheres to compliance with new requirements established by the judge. Apple reported that he should immediately allow applications to refer to websites and include options for external purchases that she has, but Apple hopes to stop the need to do this while she appeals.
The situation is the result of the fact that Apple is trying to find ways to monetize external purchases, while removing the rules of anti-world. This is the only ruling Apple that really lost in the Epic vs Apple the defeat that cost an epic games at least a billion.
If the stay is provided, this may mean that Apple will cancel approved applications updates for Spotify, Kindle and others. It will also probably mean that the planned return of the Epic Tim SweENEY from Fortnite on the iPhone will be stopped.
there is no doubt that Apple will want to look for ways to monetize applications, at the same time, following the rule of law. Nevertheless, the courts do not seem to agree that Apple owes something in debt if the purchases are made externally for applications that were common on the iPhone.
Monetization of Apple App Store largely depends on the developers using their payment systems, which means that Apple can reduce 30% or 15% of each purchase or subscription. If each application and game can simply refer to the website, Apple may be in a situation where it cannot earn money for any application in the App Store outside the annual fee for the developer.
Although there are arguments about how much Apple should, of course, is nothing. This is probably what Apple hopes to determine using his appeals.
