Apple using another AI race
Spanbg “/JPG. Class =” Hidden-Xs “> 4 Facebook X.com reddit
Joanna Stern from the Wall Street Journal of the village with Apple SVP from the development of the Craig Federighi and SVP of the world marketing of Grega Josviak, and she shared a seminum fragment, oriented to the AI before it will be A wider interview has been released. Much of what Federighi was discussing in Apple Intelligence repeated what was noticed in an earlier conversation with Ijustin, but in both interviews there were new details when Jose weighed. Yoz even mocked the idea that it was a “demo” in that seemed pointed to a “Drunting Fiery Ball” by John Gruber.
Stern forced the leaders, asking about the usefulness of Apple intelligence and whether Apple could “not lag behind” with competition. She also shared that she herself did not use Apple Intelligence and instead relied on competitors' products.
Here is Joz's answer “Again, it is important to realize that our strategy is slightly different from some other people, right? Our idea of Apple intelligence uses generative AI to provide technology for functions in our operating system and MDash; So much so that sometimes you do that you don’t even understand that you use Apple intelligence, or, you know, ai to make them, not like an apple, not like an apple. It differs from the bot in the chat, which, again, is that, I think, some people are slightly connected, for example: “Where is your bot in the chat?” We did not do this. The answer repeated a lot of moods in my play, which I wrote about Apple's position in the AI race. There are so many Apple pits as direct competitors in Chatgpt, and this seems incorrect.
Federighi takes another step, explaining that Apple does not need to deliver each technology on Earth. No one asked why Apple was not a shopping place like Amazon, or why she did not create a competitor on YouTube, so it seems strange that everyone requires Apple to put a chat bout.
You can see the video below.
Instead of an appointment point, managers explain that Apple intelligence is a background structure that improves what users do every day. Technically, they should not even think that they use AI, not to mention Apple intelligence.
the Playground image made this sloppy image when it was proposed using ' wwdc '
, the personal intelligence of Apple is just starting to spread through the operating systems outside their early sets. Developers can start using a model at a concert to achieve results that they would have to pay for ChatGPT, and Siphon OFF user data for this.
there are rumors that Siri will receive the LLM bacund, and even with these contextual updates using applications, it seems that Apple will release the AI or Chat Bot. Instead, the Apple ecosystem will act as a backend for personalized, contextual and proactive interactions that occur in different devices and applications.
as I shared earlier, it may seem that Apple is behind because Image PlayGround makes terrible images, and Siri still does not know how the calendars work, but I would not bet against them. While Apple recedes, in order to already have time and guarantee that its functions are good and inable for the price -time, the rest of the world will be engaged in increasingly powerful slopes working with strongly polluting power sources.
This is not that Apple is behind the AI race, or even that he is waiting to jump forward at the right time, as I suggested in the previous work, this is that they participate in a completely different race. The one that brings powerful applications and systems on the iPhone at the same time providing users with access to the tools they need using visual intelligence and integration with ChatGPT.
while I will continue to use Apple intelligence every day for my work. I am glad to see what developers will be able to make Foundation models later in the fall.