Apple calls a punitive judgment on violation of judicial prohibitions “fundamentally unjust”

Apple. SRC = “//wp-Content/UPLOADS/9528133A614A309FC1720D127A6EC3B4.jpg”/> 0 faceBook Reddit Bluesky

the sales compensation made by the external application, It continues, because he asks for the 9th District Court to kill the “unreasonably punitive”, established by the JVONNE GONZALEZ judge, Rogers.

Apple reported that he deliberately violated the lawsuit for 2021, which was not applied until 2024, and should remove all barriers to purchases external applications and binding. Staying on the order was requested and rejected, but the battle continues.

according to the LAW360 report, Apple called on the ninth district court to throw the mandate established by the judge. Apple called the order to allow external communication and zero commission on external purchases “excessively caramed” and “fundamentally unfair”.

These appeal processes can take months, even years. Expect there, from Apple, Epic and ships.

one loss of Apple in the epic case

all this happens as a result of the study by EPIC VS Apple. Apple won against EPIC on each front, except for one, MDash; Anti-Stores.

Apple won almost every account against Epic. Image source: Epic

Apple was forced to allow the developers of the applications to bind the outside, but there was no clear definition of what this means. Thus, Apple introduced a complex external connection, which made it functionally useless.

Epic complained in March 2025 for implementation, as a result of which the judge said that Apple violated the court decision. Discovery also showed that Apple’s internal discussions on this topic were intentionally opposing the spirit of order.

complaints and accusations that Apple leaders lying under the oath led to a significant response of the judge. It is not clear where all this will lead, but the developers are already using a free trip open to the mandate.