Apple appeals the court’s decision, which is entrusted with the shifts of the App Store
0 facebook X.com reddit Bluesky
“Updateded Venducation
14pted> updated Venduction
, making the courts and their obligatory changes to the App Store as Fallout from Epic vs. Apple Cast, Apple also filed an appeal against the solution.
May 1, 2025 of the US District Judge Ivonn Gonzalez Rogers ordered the Apple to immediately make specific changes to The practice of his application store, after he decided that he had not fulfilled his previous obligations. The judge specifically abandoned any delay, but allowed Apple an appeal & mdash; And now it has done it.
First of all, having discovered the “row”, Apple filed a notice of appeal in the district court of the United States in the North California district. An application is a short document that lists what business is appealed with & mdash; The US district case is 4: 20-CV-05640-YGR & MDash; and the names of the legal adviser Apple.
there is no schedule for appeal yet, and there was no public response regarding the court regarding the filing. This is just the first mandatory step in filing an appeal that Apple has already confirmed what this will do when it says “we strongly disagree” with the decision.
Since the decision required immediate compliance, Apple had to fulfill all the orders of the judge, but, of course, hoping to cancel at least some of them. The appeal is also specifically against the resolution regarding the alleged anti -competitive practice in the App Store, and has nothing to do with the potential trial of criminal disrespects conducted by Judge Gonzalez Rogers.
as part of the order, Apple had to abandon their restrictions on developers who promote alternatives to the App Store payment system. As a result, companies that lobbyed this change, for example, Spotify, immediately updated their applications to provide users with the possibility of direct payments.
The solution follows over the years of Epic Games against Apple Trit, which Apple won the account at each bank. In this case, Apple anti -a -sterge practices were considered, which limited the developers, and Apple claimed that she subsequently fulfilled the court decision on this issue.
However, epic games argued that adherence to Apple instead “disappointed and effectively cancel the relief that the court ordered.”
in her ruling changes, Judge Gonzalez Rogers, agreed that Apple created “new anti-competitive awards. She said that Apple “thought that this court endures such an invisible, was a rude weakening.” News
