TECH

Apple to combat violation of court prohibitions on violation of the judicial prohibition: “We strongly disagree”

Apple does not agree with the reign

“Hidden-X.

Judge Ivonn Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple deliberately violated the lawsuit that demanded that the company throw off its anti-sized practices. The company really proposed a new set of rules, but this required a complicated binding of decisions and 27% of the commission.

Apple provided a statement by 9TO5MAC at the end of the midst, which states that it does not agree with the decision. The company will comply with the order, but will appeal.

“We strongly disagree with the decision. We will comply with the order of the court, and we will appeal. ” There is also the opportunity that this can be charged with criminal contempt.

Epic General Director Tim Suini believed that Apple was ready to come to the negotiation table. He proposed Apple's “peaceful offer”, which requires Apple to delete his payments made outside the App Store throughout the world and his requirements for relations around the world.

, given Apple's response to the solution, the transaction with Sweeney seems unlikely. Moreover, in fact, there is no growth in the conclusion of the transaction with the Dead Set for the delivery of the Epic Game Store on the iPhone, which will most likely lead to a larger number of trials.

Leave a Reply