As Openi is fighting the Law on the commodity value for its now in the IO-Brand. Scenes.
‘not a worn device’
, as reported yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday Google-Bartle-Battle-Battlemed, not in the past. The startup, which approves the IO branding from the recently formed Io Products, Inc., Inc., is too close to comfort.
But the story does not end there. According to TechCrunch, a set of recently made public documents shows that Openai representatives, including Tan Tan, the former director of Apple, who is now the main employee of the equipment in IO, met with the general director of IYo, Jason Rukel, to “find out more about the IYO product in the ear.” Internal emails, however, downplay the importance of meetings, because they show that the team left not impressed after several demonstration failures. The device, “as for Altman, he also sent a declaration to the court, saying that” our intention in this cooperation was and consists in creating products that go beyond traditional products and interfaces. ” The device ”,“ Electronic letters from IYo show that Openai and IO were especially curious in one specific part of Iyo technology: its scanning process 3D. In an email, Tan Ramma has released the idea of buying a database about rumors from the IYO supplier, calling it a “useful starting point of ergonomics”. The court documents show that the Iyo general was repeatedly handed out Openai on investing, partnership or even the acquisition of IYO, for $ 200 million. Tan ultimately refused. Let it be known in the comments.
Update [11:39 PM. ET]: The wording in this post was adjusted to better reflect that Openais 8217 operators; Thus, the word “ First ” was added to two segments.
