The largest theatrical gambling of Apple, in history, 250 million US dollars. On the heels of its release, a new report shows that the company weighs a big step that would be seriously a theatrical one. WSJ
bin Fritz and Joe Flint write in The Wall Street Journal:
Apple did not invest in the ability to free and advertise her films, like Amazon, when he acquired MGM. Warner Bros. It distributes “F1” for Apple and receives the percentage of income from cash fees, which increases with the sale of tickets, according to a person familiar with the agreement.
This approach saves Apple for overhead expenses, but puts it in the mercy of partners who can prioritize in their own productions. Warner Bros. It releases Superman, its most important film of the year, two weeks after F1.
Press Secretary of Warner said that he gives “F1” a “reliable global marketing campaign that is included in the film about its size.”
Apple leaders discussed how their own theater distribution began, people familiar with this issue.
This last proposal was chosen with a small additional commentary in the conclusion of the article. But in fact, it would be very great news if Apple followed the movement. Coda was the first film from a streamer to win an Oscar for the best picture.
with these films, Apple will provide only a limited theatrical issue to receive awards. Think about the killers of the flower moon, Napoleon and Argail.
This approach was less fruitful. After several disappointing issues in a row, Apple canceled a wide theatrical plan for the wolves at the last minute and folded its slate with the release of a film with direct films. Blurft
Do you think Apple should make more theatrical ones or continue to retreat? Let us know in the comments.
I like to watch films in cinemas … But I think that Apple should continue to retreat and focus on providing better experience in their products for bread and workshops of equipment for consumer electronics and software. For several years they don’t feel that Apple – or at least their executive set – has been distracted from new bright ideas over the past few years, spreading the company too subtle and without giving the quality that we expect (and deserve).
the wolf, getting out of the theater issue, over the past year, having failed, four different advertisements, the vision of the jam, the Apple intelligence agents were detained and barely say: “Liquid Glass”, receiving a lot of criticism for the problems of analysis … I understand that I probably sound like a broken record for these and other stories, but I I think that we must widely consider these problems. Apple leaders are clearly a lot of ambitious ideas, and they do not say no. Yours have lost your attention. – Steve Jobs
View all comments
, no doubt, why Eddie Kew made a point of view to tell Bloomberg: “This concept that theaters are leaving is not true … Theatrical experiences are great, and I am a huge fan.”
Do you think Apple should devote itself to theatrical or continue to retreat? Tell us in the comments. $ 249)
100W USB-C Power Adapter for fast charging
