Lawyers of large technologies for Apple and others "actively encourage lawlessness"

the WSJ Piece today suggests that large technological lawyers for Apple, Amazon, Google and other industry giants not only cannot only not Advise your customers. They violate the law.

To understand the basis of this argument, we need to quickly re -select what happened in the lawsuit filed against the company Epic Games.

Apple basically won – but the company aggressively resisted, obeying in one area where it lost. The manufacturer of the iPhone said that if he had to allow purchases in the application outside the App Store, he would still demand the same clean commission after a payment for payment. This canceled the clear intention of the judge’s decision. The judge in this case convincingly implied that she did not believe in this and ordered the company to transfer all her internal documents regarding the decision. When Apple claimed that she could not observe the deadline, the second judge said that he also thought that the company was lying.

The original judge subsequently said that the Senior Executive Director of Apple is lying under the oath, and talked about this for a criminal investigation. – That is, regarding the discussions between the company and its lawyers. The confidentiality of the discussions between the client and his lawyer is protected by law, while internal discussions are not between the leaders of the company.

In the epic case, Apple originally argued that many thousands of internal documents were privileged, but later admitted that they were that they demanded a more thorough consideration of the claims .wsj suggest that this was probably the result of bad advice from Apple 8217 lawyers; And the same applies to those who advise other technological giants. Standing – known as a privilege – which actually was supposed to be transferred to the government or lawyers who are a lawsuit on behalf of Epic […]

“Lawyers are people who should say“ no ”when something crosses the line, and they do not even fulfill this duty – they are actively encouraging this,” said John Newman, professor of law at the University of Miami and former deputy director of FTC. “It seems to have simply created or at least contributed to the culture that – if they were not our technological companies Crown Jewel – I think that we would call the culture of lawlessness.”

The reason involving an antitrust expert is that these lawyers do “ Stunning ” The amounts of money from their customers, therefore, are motivated to protect it at all costs, and face small consequences when they are caught. She is an antimonopoly lawyer who once worked for FTC and competing Duckduckgo Google. She Suggests Some Lawyers Might Not Feel Vulnerble for Oversteping, Especially When The Ramiffications of Getting Caure Caun Can Seem Inconsequential.

9TO5MAC ’ S Take

We ’ VE Been Arguing for MANY YEARS Now that Apple is Just Storing to satisfy the fornication problems for yourself when it gives the middle finger to the regulators and judges. This, of course, is not to skate where the legitimate washer is sent. The fact that this allows things to achieve a point to lie under the oath is simply crazy. If Apple really receives bad advice from his lawyers, there is an obvious solution to this problem.